ProveIt Supplements

Independent, evidence-based supplement analysis.

✓ Not Sponsored

✓ No Paid Reviews

✓ Science-Based

Company

  • About Us
  • Our Methodology
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Authors

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Affiliate Disclosure

Resources

  • All Categories
  • Ingredient Database
  • Browse Supplements
  • FAQ

© 2025 ProveIt Supplements. All rights reserved.

Medical Disclaimer: The information provided is for educational purposes only and is not intended as medical advice. Always consult with a qualified healthcare professional before starting any supplement regimen.

Prove It
Browse SupplementsBlogAuthorsAboutMethodologyFAQ
Get Your Personalized Supplement StackSupplement Stack Quiz
Menu
HomeBrowse SupplementsBlogAuthorsAboutMethodologyFAQ
Back

Samambaia

Also known as: Samambaia, Brazilian fern, Dicksonia sellowiana

Overview

Samambaia refers to a group of fern species, most commonly *Dicksonia sellowiana*, traditionally utilized in South American herbal medicine. It is not a single standardized chemical entity but rather a botanical extract. Historically, it has been employed for its purported anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antimicrobial properties. As a dietary supplement, its use is primarily rooted in ethnobotanical knowledge and traditional practices, rather than extensive modern clinical research. The scientific literature specifically on Samambaia as a supplement ingredient is notably sparse, with a significant lack of high-quality clinical trials or systematic reviews available to substantiate its efficacy or safety.

Benefits

There is currently no high-quality clinical evidence, such as systematic reviews or meta-analyses, specifically on Samambaia supplementation that meets rigorous scientific criteria (e.g., randomized controlled trials with adequate sample sizes and proper controls). While some studies on general antioxidant and anti-inflammatory plant extracts (not specifically Samambaia) suggest potential benefits in conditions like osteoarthritis or fatigue recovery, these findings do not directly evaluate or support the use of Samambaia. Consequently, no robust evidence exists for Samambaia’s effects on lipid profiles, inflammation, or other clinical endpoints. Traditional uses include the treatment of inflammation and infections, but these claims lack rigorous clinical validation.

How it works

The proposed mechanisms of action for Samambaia are largely inferred from the general properties of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory phytochemicals, such as flavonoids and phenolic compounds, which are commonly found in various fern species. However, there is a significant lack of direct molecular target identification or pharmacokinetic data specifically for Samambaia from peer-reviewed clinical studies. The absorption and bioavailability of any potentially active compounds from Samambaia extracts have not been characterized in human studies, making it difficult to definitively explain how it might interact with body systems.

Side effects

Comprehensive safety data from controlled clinical trials on Samambaia are currently unavailable. While traditional use might suggest a low toxicity profile, potential adverse effects, drug interactions, and contraindications have not been well-documented or rigorously studied. Without the benefit of clinical trials, the safety of Samambaia cannot be assured, particularly for long-term use or in specific populations such as pregnant women, children, or individuals with pre-existing medical conditions. Users should exercise caution due to the lack of established safety profiles.

Dosage

There are no established dosing guidelines for Samambaia derived from clinical research. Traditional preparations vary significantly in concentration, form (e.g., teas, extracts), and preparation methods. Consequently, there is no scientific data available regarding the minimum effective dose, optimal dose, or maximum safe dose for human consumption. Without clinical validation, any recommended dosage would be speculative and not evidence-based, making it difficult to provide precise instructions for its use as a supplement.

FAQs

Is Samambaia effective for inflammation or arthritis?

No high-quality clinical evidence, such as randomized controlled trials or systematic reviews, currently supports the effectiveness of Samambaia for inflammation or arthritis.

Is Samambaia safe to take?

The safety of Samambaia has not been established through clinical trials. Due to the lack of comprehensive safety data, caution is advised, especially for long-term use or in specific populations.

How should Samambaia be taken?

There is no standardized dosing or formulation of Samambaia that has been clinically validated. Traditional preparations vary widely, and no specific instructions can be given based on scientific evidence.

When can I expect to see results from taking Samambaia?

Due to the lack of clinical data and established efficacy, it is unknown when or if results can be expected from taking Samambaia. Its effects are not scientifically validated.

Research Sources

  • https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/nutrition/articles/10.3389/fnut.2022.1026450/full – This source discusses the role of antioxidants in health, but it does not specifically evaluate Samambaia. It highlights the general benefits of antioxidant compounds found in various plants, which may be relevant to the proposed mechanisms of Samambaia but does not provide direct evidence for Samambaia itself.
  • https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/nutrition/articles/10.3389/fnut.2025.1567438/full – This article likely pertains to the broader field of nutrition and plant-derived compounds, potentially touching upon anti-inflammatory effects. However, it does not focus on Samambaia, indicating that any findings are general to plant extracts and not specific to this particular fern species.
  • https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38362130/ – This PubMed entry refers to a study that is not specifically about Samambaia. It may cover other herbal supplements or general nutritional interventions, but it does not provide direct evidence for the efficacy or safety of Samambaia.
  • https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0278356 – This PLOS ONE article is not directly related to Samambaia. It likely discusses research on other botanical or nutritional interventions, reinforcing the point that specific, high-quality research on Samambaia is lacking in major scientific databases.
  • https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02958644 – This ClinicalTrials.gov entry describes a registered clinical trial, but it is not for Samambaia. It serves as an example of a clinical study, highlighting the absence of such trials specifically for Samambaia in major registries.
  • https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31975514/ – This PubMed entry, similar to others provided, does not pertain to Samambaia. It likely covers research on other supplements or health topics, further emphasizing the lack of dedicated, peer-reviewed clinical research on Samambaia.

Supplements Containing Samambaia

Neuro Cogent by Amazon Therapeutics
53

Neuro Cogent

Amazon Therapeutics

Score: 53/100
Samambaia by Amazon Therapeutics
70

Samambaia

Amazon Therapeutics

Score: 70/100